Martijn, Dutch Pedophile Association, Outlawed

When I was on the internet today I found several articles on the fact that Martijn is now outlawed in the Netherlands. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/27/martijn-dutch-pedophile-association_n_1630171.html Martijn has been around since 1982 and is part of the movement to normalize pedophilia. They are considering appealing the courts decision. According to those involved with Martijn they are claiming that being disbanded is against their freedom of speech. It took thirty years for the citizens of the Netherlands to get this organization disbanded. They promote sex between adults and children as normal. According to the research I have done they were the only "known" pro-pedophilia organization. I say "known" because they exist all we have to do is look on the internet and see stories on pedophilia groups that have been infiltrated by law enforcement. Their is a way these pedophiles are communicating with each other. I will follow this story to see if Martijn does appeal this decision. I am glad that the citizens of the Netherlands tackled this. The reality is that those involved with this type of organization are not going to change their beliefs. Which continues to put children at risk. Rosie

A petition of more than 72.000 people was presented to the Dutch government in 2011 calling for a ban on Martijn -- an association which lobbies for the social acceptance of sexual relations between adults and children. http://www.france24.com/en/20120627-dutch-court-bans-child-sex-lobby-group

MIKE CORDER   06/27/12 08:39 AM ET  
 

THE HAGUE, Netherlands — A Dutch court outlawed a pedophile association Wednesday, saying its promotion of sexual contact between adults and children breaches the country's generally accepted moral values.
The civil court in Assen ordered the association, called Martijn, to immediately be dissolved.
The court said in a statement that Martijn is a threat to public order because it "glorifies sexual contact (between adults and children) and presents it as something that should be normal and acceptable."

Paedophile club censors own website

I came across this article on twitter today http://www.rnw.nl/english/article/paedophile-club-censors-own-website Martijn is an association of pedophiles who want to legalize sex between adults and minors under the age of consent. This link http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=92b_1337190723
is to a live feed at the Hague. The link displays this statement:

The next 6 weeks the court in Assen leans over a case on whether pedophile association Martijn is a danger to society or just a club where phedopiles share erotic stories on the website and talk about their feelings.

Wednesday three judges heard the pros and cons of a ban of the Public Prosecutor (OM) and the association Martijn.

I found several stories of a petition to force the Martijn organization to dismantle. Which has lead to the Hague investigation. I haven't been able to access their web site http://martijn.org all day.  It has been attacked at least two times since 2010 by anonymous. Martijn was formed in 1982 and in 1994 they were thrown out of the LGBT community for their promotion of pedophilia. I have also read that at least eight of their directors have had charges of child sex offenses since it's inception in 1982. It is good to see that in the Netherlands they are doing something about the movement to normalize pedophilia. Especially since most of the early movement to normalize pedophilia came from the Netherlands. I have found several different articles on this topic and have cut and pasted them at the end of the article below. This way the reader can get a fuller understanding of what has been going on with this organization.

I, in no way feel that by dismantling this pro-pedophile organization will stop pedophilia. I think it will send the message for those trying to normalize pedophilia that this fight will be tougher then they thought. Please take the time to read through these articles. Thanks, Rosie

Tuesday 29 May RNW - NEWS AND ANALYSIS FROM THE NETHERLANDS IN 10 LANGUAGES, WORLDWIDE 24/7 ON RADIO, TV AND ONLINE

 

Published on : 27 November 2011 - 4:04pm | By RNW News Desk (Photo: ANP)

Dutch paedophile association Martijn has removed pictures of naked children from its website in response to “persistent attacks”, a spokesperson for the group says.
Both the Public Prosecutor's Offie and a court in the Netherlands recently decided not to prosecute the organisation, which claims to promote the interests of paedophiles and seeks to legalise paedophilia. On Thursday, however, the Public Prosecutor's Office announced it would ask a civil court to ban and disband the organisation.
The Public Prosecutor argues that Martijn condones and glorifies paedophilia and paedophile sex, something against which both children and parents ought to be protected.

Thank You!

I want to say thank you for the person who has posted one of the posts from this blog onto their Facebook page. I really appreciate your helping get the word out on the movement to normalize pedophilia.

DSM-V Open Comment Period May 2 thru June 15

According to the APA page for the DSM-V the comment period is open http://www.dsm5.org/Pages/default.aspx The comment period is the period of time that people can register on the DSM site and send in a comment pertaining to the current proposed changes. I want to encourage people to do this. A big concern I have is that pedophiles on the boychat forums are well organized and they are working on a plan to send in comments. Here is the link to my YouTube page that shows the video of this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsfvXaJpRqo I personally find it very scary that pedophiles are working hard at having input into the proposed changes in the DSM-5. Their goal of course is to get pedophilia out of the DSM because of their belief that it is a sexual orientation not a mental illness. Just like homosexuality used to be.

I thought I would start this blog post discussing paraphilic disorders. According to the APA DSM-V http://www.dsm5.org/proposedrevision/Pages/ParaphilicDisorders.aspx these are the disorders that are currently proposed as paraphilic disorders:

 

Paraphilic Disorders. This category contains diagnoses that were listed in DSM-IV under the chapter of Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders. The Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders Work Group has been responsible for addressing these revisions. Many of the disorders that were previously listed in the Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders chapter in DSM-IV also have been distributed throughout separate chapters on Sexual Dysfunctions and Gender Dysphoria.  The work group has proposed that this chapter be renamed from Paraphilias to Paraphillic Disorders. They have also added two course specifiers (In a Controll Environment and In Remission) to all of the diagnostic criteria sets included in this chapter. Pedophilic Disorder now has an additional subtype (Hebephilic Subtype). Finally, the work group is proposing Hypersexual Disorder and Paraphilic Coercive Disorder for inclusion in Section III, which is a section of the DSM-5 text in which conditions that require further research will be included.

I am especially concerned with some of the changes in wording and wanted to show what the current criteria are compared to what the proposed criteria changes are. The wording may be slight changes but the implications can be large.

Rockefeller Foundation which earmarked funds for sex “research.”

I thought I would talk about the Rockefeller Foundation and it's affiliation with the social sciences and their relationship with sexuality and Kinsey. I found the following website http://aabss.org/Perspectives1999/f20Jones.html where the information below is from:

The basic story of the Rockefeller Foundation is well-known. As part of the "Gospel of Wealth" philosophy embraced by many of the great business tycoons of the late 1800s and early 1900s, people like Mellon, Rockefeller, and Carnegie created philanthropic organizations to influence positively the increasingly industrial society they had helped create. Rockefeller's benefactions were wide-ranging, including projects in the medical and natural sciences, public health, and the general humanities. A special focus of Rockefeller's philanthropic interest, however, was the burgeoning of the fields of social science. J. D. Rockefeller felt that if the new fields of political science, economics, sociology, and the like were only as well-established as the natural sciences and could discover the basic laws of society, the further acquisition of new knowledge that would result could ultimately be used to improve the conditions of human life around the planet. The problem was that a chronic lack of funds in these new academic disciplines hampered practical research efforts and made their increasingly theoretical work more "remote from pressing current problems" (Rockefeller Foundation, 1933a, p. 38). For this reason, a major focus of Rockefeller's new Foundation, and especially its allied philanthropy, the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial Fund, was the promotion of the social sciences. These groups sought to accomplish this goal by using a few standard techniques.

First and foremost in the early years of the Foundation was the development of several university centers of social science research in various parts of the world. The stated goal of this practice was creating "an easy interchange of faculty and students engaged in the study of common problems," and "securing recognition from university administrators that research facilities and opportunities are essential for the social sciences" Not only would the non-academic world profit from the practical research thus spawned, but the indirect values of such a program were seen as nothing less than the "creation of international understanding and good will"(Rockefeller Foundation, 1933a, p. 39).

Dr. Robert S. Morrison was the head of the Medical Division of the Rockefeller Foundation when the foundation was involved with Kinsey and his "flawed" research. In reading about this foundation they had their hands all across the world. They were especially interested in the social sciences (sexuality) and helped fund Margaret Mead with her research on human sexuality. She was doing research into human sexuality at least 25 plus years before Kinsey. The following site explains what the Rockefeller Foundation spent funding on. http://www.tcunation.com/profiles/blogs/the-nwo-and-the

The National Research Council and the Medical Division of the Rockefeller Foundation provided thousands of dollars towards studies in sexual physiology and behavior. The Rockefeller Foundation initially helped to organize and fund the American Social Hygiene Association in 1913 to alter public attitudes regarding prostitution, and to work for birth control and other social reforms. During the 1920s faulty research, designed to satisfy a specific agenda, was produced by Margaret Mead and others “while misleading the West with effusive claims about the supposedly positive, happy nature of wildly promiscuous ‘primitive’ sexuality.” [xiii]