Saturday, March 31, 2012

Pedophile Activism HISTORY AND STRATEGIES OF PRO-PEDOPHILE ACTIVISM


In doing further research for this blog I came across ensis wiki  DOCUMENTING PEDOPHILE AND RSO ACTIVISM http://sdn.altervista.org/ensis/Pedophile_Activism.php 
It is a very interesting site and proves an overview of the pedophile activist movement. The site also has other information on pedophilia. I have added a link to this page on the right side of the blog. It is well put together and well researched. I think this article will help the reader understand the movement to normalize pedophilia going back to the early 1930's. I have more research I will be discussing on this blog about the influences on Kinsey. Where he went to college, the college's connection to Eugenics and the professors and other modern day what I would call deviants who strongly influenced Kinsey. IMO they reinforced Kinsey being a deviant. They also played a large part in his research which harmed children and pushed for the acceptance of deviant behavior in our society. This behavior includes pedophilia, the homosexual revolution, the sexual revolution of the 1960's, the porn industry, playboy magazine, hustler magazine and penthouse, just to name a few. Almost all of these things have been proven harmful and destructive to women and children. Rosie

Pedophile Activism
HISTORY AND STRATEGIES OF PRO-PEDOPHILE ACTIVISM
Pro-pedophile activism (also spelled pro-paedophile activism) refers to a small socio-political movement advocating the acceptance of pedophilia as a sexual orientation rather than a psychological disorder. Pro-pedophile activists also advocate the related goals of "normalizing" the concept of sexual activities involving an adult and a child (legally defined as child sexual abuse in every developed country), legalizing such activities by lowering or abolishing the age of consent laws, and reform of child pornography legislation. Some but not all pro-pedophile activists self-identify as pedophiles, or as adults attracted to children in a sexual or romantic way.
Pro-pedophile activists have described their movement as analogous to other new social movements, in particular the LGBT social movements, and some call for what they describe as "children's rights", to allow children to make decisions about sexual relationships without constraint by the authority of their parents.  Some pro-pedophile groups are involved in opposing vigilante groups that target pedophiles.
Present-day pro-pedophile activism occurs mostly through websites and internet discussion forums; in the past the movement was advocated through periodicals such as the Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia (1987-1995) and through a few membership organizations that have declining membership or have ceased their activities in recent times, such as the  and the North American Man/Boy Love Association and others.

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Some Words of Caution From a Good Friend

I am very excited about the work I am doing on my YouTube page http://www.youtube.com/user/Rosieforchange, my blog memoirofaredemptivelife.com and of course this blog where I am trying to look at the normalization of pedophilia from Kinsey forward. This blog takes a lot more time and I realize I won't be able to blog as frequently as I do on my memoir blog. This blog is focused solely on helping people to understand that there is a movement to normalize pedophilia and my role is to share the facts to help educate people. I am trying to do it in a methodical, cohesive way. Some of the things I am finding with my research are unnerving. For instance, the role that the Rockefeller foundation played beyond helping Kinsey through grants to pay for his research. The also financially supported the movement to change the model penal code throughout this County.

When sharing what I am doing with a good friend she was very concerned. She believes what I am doing is the right thing. Her concern is that once you delve into evil it can consume you. She is concerned that I will be harmed as I continue this blog in particular. She is concerned for me spirituality because she feels what I am doing is spiritual warfare. It is true that what I am doing is exposing evil. IMO the most heinous evil of all; harming children. Not only harming children but doing so to fulfill their sexual gratification. Sex is supposed to be how a child is conceived not what destroys a child. I am sick to death with those who promote the movement to normalize pedophilia with their stories that children can consent to sexual relationships and seduce adults. These "adults" and I use that word loosely need to believe that the child can consent or seduce so they don't have to come to terms with their harming of children. Their thought patterns are so skewed and those who support them like B4U-ACT and The False Memory Syndrome(doesn't exist) Foundation need to be outed and held accountable for their role in this movement. I have posted B4U-ACT supporters and FMS(doesn't exist)F current and deceased advisory board members. All of the people listed below are all part of the movement to normalize pedophilia.

Sunday, March 25, 2012

I added the Dodd report to the Reece Committee Report

I uploaded the original Dodd Report to the Reece Committee.

What Was The Reece Committee?

In doing further research into Kinsey and his role in the normalization of pedophilia. I decided to focus on the Reece committee. I found this paper Philanthropy and the American Regime:
Is It Time for Another Congressional Investigation of Tax-Exempt Foundations?  http://www.hudson.org/files/publications/Philanthropy%20and%20the%20American%20Regime.pdf The author of the paper is By John Fonte, Ph.D. Senior Fellow Hudson Institute. It is an interesting article and I am learning more about the Reece Committee. According to this article the reason the Reece Committee was because philanthropy was being investigated. There was concern that big philanthropy was not working for the greater good but to push their agenda. Here is an excerpt from the article:
The investigation focused on the major foundations, or what could be
called Big Philanthropy: Rockefeller, Ford, the Carnegie Corporation, and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Essentially, the report charged them with “undermining”the American Regime, declaring:
 “With several tragically outstanding exceptions, such as The Institute of Pacific Relations, foundations have not directly supported organizations which, in turn, operated to support Communism. However, some of the larger foundations have directly supported ‘subversion’ in the true meaning of that term, namely the process of undermining some of our vitally protective concepts and principles. They have actively supported attacks upon our social and governmental system and financed the promotion of socialism and collectivist ideas.” ( p. 4 )
This is my concern with the Rockefeller Foundation supporting Kinsey. Kinsey's whole premise was to change moral standards in this country. He wanted to help society change into a more deviant society where harming children for one's on sexual gratification was considered acceptable. Where lying that 10% of the population was homosexual which wasn't true at all. I found an article that explains the percentage of homosexuals in the U.S. http://cnsnews.com/news/article/us-adults-overestimate-homosexual-population-much-tenfold It is estimated that as of 2009 homosexuals account for 2-4% of the population. In the late 40's and early 50's it was much less because the U.S. wasn't as populated as it is now. This lying about homosexuality played a large role in the gay rights movement. Something I will talk about in later posts on this blog. Lying about how many married couples cheated on their spouses. In my research I have found Kinsey's numbers for extramarital affairs was 50% by age 40 for males and around 26% by age 40 for females. What gets lost in these numbers were that almost all of those involved with his study were; deviants, sexually abused children, prostitutes, pedophiles, sexual offenders, incarcerated, etc. This was in no way an accurate representation of "normal" people in our society. Not to mention Hugh Hefner starting Playboy Magazine and the sexual revolution. All of these things based on lies I'm not even going to say faulty numbers I believe they were out and out lies.

Friday, March 23, 2012

Research from the Kinsey Institute Web Page

I decided to go to the Kinsey Institute page http://www.iub.edu/~kinsey/resources/ak-data.html right there they admit that they only had 5300 males and 5940 female participants in the study. I think they should be ashamed of themselves. What they aren't telling is that for the males it amounted to approx one quarter of a half of percent of all of the men in the labor market. For females it was approx one half of one half of a percent of women in the labor market. These statistics are very small and will be smaller when compared against the number of white males and females in the 1940 and 1950 census. I am still working on learning how to read the census so I don't have that data yet.
Sample:
5300 white males and 5940 white females provided almost all the data, with the majority of participants being younger white adults with some college education. (This part of the sample is referred to as the "College Sample.")


These ratios are so low that if it were my research I wouldn't feel happy with such a low statistical number. How they feel that this is okay is beyond me. The claim that:
 Kinsey tried to compensate for volunteer bias in his sample by interviewing 100% of the individuals available in a given organization or group. Approximately 25% of the sex histories came from these 100% groups. (Kinsey did not believe a random sample was possible.)
I argue that the percentages of those interview were so significantly small that they should have been thrown out of. I believe if Kinsey didn't kill himself  because he did in a sadistic way) after he lost the Rockefeller money. That he would have been proven discredited. He lost the money because of an investigation by the Reece Committee. This is a link from Dr. Reisman's book Kinsey Crimes and Consequences http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/Chapter_9_-_Kinsey_Crimes_%26_Consequences_-_Reisman.pdf the following information is from page 271.
During the Reece Committee hearings, Dr. Albert Hobbs, a
widely published University of Pennsylvania sociologist, critiqued the “skewed” Kinsey data in scathing terms.
I think Kinsey knew he was heading to be discredited which could have contributed to his killing himself. Yet you have his institute still plugging along like business as usual. They are still using very skewed data as the basis for the sexual revolution movement. If social media was what it is now in the 40's and 50's there would have been plenty of immediate information to let the public know how skewed his data was. He would have been a laughing stock. The reality is that back then media was completely different and the general public didn't have access to information like they do now. So they were seeing what those in power wanted them to see. Twitter happens in real time and has helped shaped revolutions in the past year. Can you imagine the revolution that would have happened to Kinsey, his institution and the Rockefeller Foundation if Twitter was around then? I am trying to start a revolution to end the movement to normalize pedophilia. This movement has been going on since Kinsey and needs to be stopped. Please help! Rosie

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Interview on Libery Counsel about Kinsey's Imact on the Moral Penal Code.

I found this video last night when I was doing research. I couldn't get it to work correctly it kept pausing and I left a message on Liberty Counsel page to let them know I was having a problem with it. They wrote me back and let me know that they replayed it and it was fine. I watched it again and it had no problem with it. It is a really good interview with Dr. Reisman.

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Model Penal Code

What is the Moral Penal Code? According to http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Model+Penal+Code:
The Model Penal Code (MPC) is one of the most important developments in American law, and perhaps the most important influence on American Criminal Law since it was completed in 1962. Conceived as a way to standardize and organize the often-fragmentary criminal codes enacted by the states, the MPC has influenced a large majority of states to change their laws. Although some provisions of the MPC are now considered outdated, and the code fails to address many important recent criminal law issues, its impact could still be felt as the country entered the twenty-first century.
Members of the American Law Institute (ALI), a group of judges, lawyers, and legal scholars whose purpose is to clarify and improve the law, began working on the Model Penal Code in 1952. The group had abandoned two previous attempts to create a model criminal code. The third attempt took ten years, and the ALI produced numerous drafts, reports, and revisions.
Herbert Wechsler, a Columbia Law School professor, served as the chief reporter, or principal drafter. From 1953 to 1962, ALI council members examined, considered, and debated the work of Wechsler, his staff, and his advisors in a total of 31 drafts. Finally, in 1962, the MPC was completed and published.
As I discussed in an earlier post Kinsey had a lot to do with helping change the model penal codes in the U.S. What I have found doing more research is he also influenced model penal codes across the world. What I didn't clearly know is the role the Rockefeller foundation had in funding to get the penal codes implemented. I knew they were responsible for funding Kinsey's dog and pony show. It makes me wonder why? What did they have to gain by these laws changing? They certainly didn't make tougher laws at the time. They became more lax and the sexual offender laws were reduced since Kinsey made the determination from his "research" that every male is a sexual offender and a deviant. I found an article that discusses the role Kinsey played http://www.cwfa.org/images/content/A%20Nation%20Deceived.pdf

  Kinsey’s pseudo science brought major changes in public policy and American law. He testified before legislatures advocating the removal of almost all criminal sex laws. Morris Ernst, an American Civil Liberties lawyer, designed a legal strategy to overturn America’s Judeo-Christian ethics’ sex laws. Ernst stated “virtually every page of the Kinsey report touches on some section of the legal code…”
 With funding by the Rockefeller foundation, bar associations formed committees to study laws on sexual behavior. In 1955 the new Model Penal Code replaced the Common Law view of sex crimes. This new code eventually aided in reducing the penalties for abortion, rape, desertion, seduction, alienation of affection, wife and child battery, adultery, prostitution, soliciting for masturbation, contributing to the delinquency of a minor, sodomy, “unfit” parentage, public sexual exhibition, obscenity and the list goes on.
In 1957 the Supreme Court relaxed the legal definition of obscenity. This case was handled by Ernst. In 1961, Illinois was the first state to repeal its sodomy statute. In 1973, Dr. Mary Calderone (a Kinseyan) was cited in the Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion. Also in 1973 homosexuality was removed from the list of psycho pathologies by the American Psychiatric Association.
I added the last paragraph because it supports Kinsey's role in the movement to normalize pedophilia. I am going to do research into Dr. Mary Calderone and see what role she has played if any in trying to normalize pedophilia. Rosie



Monday, March 19, 2012

1940's Era

While doing research into Kinsey I decided to look at what was happening historically at that time of his "research" I use that term loosely. I think in order to understand how Kinsey was able to pull off his dog and pony show it will help to know was happening in the US historically and politically. To be honest I am becoming more educated on this topic and am learning myself the historical and political issues that were happening that allowed Kinsey to get away with what he did. I found this web site http://www.hhsclassof58.com/year1940.htm  It gives a wonderful overview of 1940. I posted the page here.

One of my sons is following this blog. He isn't happy realizing that Kinsey was part of the normalization of pedophilia. He is enjoying learning what was happening at the time in context to Kinsey and his "research" and it's impact on the US. He especially can't believe the miniscule statistics that created the significant change in laws across the whole US. It made me think that addressing the history and social climate of the US as the normalization of pedophilia began and moved forward, will bring to life what Kinsey really did. How Kinsey would be able to label the greatest generation, deviants and get away with it. This lead me to think about comparing the population as a whole against the population in prisons for sexual offenses. It will show what the percentage was and it will show the real statistic that Kinsey used to help change the moral penal code in the US. The geek in me is becoming very fulfilled working on this blog. I honestly love doing research and I love learning and I am thoroughly enjoying being able to educate on the movement to normalize pedophile so we can learn what we need to do to stop it. Rosie

 

If you were born in 1940, you were one of 2,360,399 babies who were born in the U.S. that year. 1940 was the beginning of the Cold War; babies born in that year were called war babies.  In 1940 the life expectancy was 68.2 for females and 60.8 for males. America was still struggling to emerge from a depression that had already stretched to a full decade.  You were born into a home where the approximate income was $1,900.00.  The average cost of a house in 1940 was $6,550.00.   Following are some interesting facts about your birth year.
 

Sunday, March 18, 2012

Kinsey's Dog and Pony Show.

The history of the sexual revolution has at its head Kinsey, a deviant, liar and manipulator. Almost all of the model penal codes in this country have been effected by Kinsey. He, almost single-handedly changed every sexual offender law in the U.S. On What evidence you may ask? According to the American Legislative Exchange Council. Restoring Legal Protections for Women And Children A Historical Analysis of The States Criminal Code (found on the bottom of this blog). 18,000.00 interviews.
Gebhard revealed that of the 18,000 interviews once widely considered so scientifically impressive, 5,300 white males accounted for the research base in the
Male Volume; of that 5,300, 2,446 were designated as convicts, 1,003 homosexuals, 50 transvestites, 117 mentally ill, 342 “Other,” 650 sexually abused boys. This yielded 4,628 n=Aberrant and 873n=“Normal” Male subjects. 13
Can you believe this? Laws were changed all across this country with this miniscule amount of scientific data. Only white males were part of this data. That alone was a statistical error not a very good cross section of the male population. According to https://www.familysearch.org/1940census there were:

132 million people were living in the 48 Continental United States in 1940.

Here is a table from http://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2010/winter/1940-census.html
That breaks down the labor population both male and female in the US in 1940.

Saturday, March 17, 2012

Reupload The Big Scam

This is a video on You Tube. It helps to uncover a child sexual predator pedophile with the user name rutskater . He poses as a child and posts videos of children on his page.

Friday, March 16, 2012

The truth about Alfred Kinsey/YouTube

I found a site when doing some research into Kinsey and his affect on the normalization of pedophilia and found this article.  http://www.cwfa.org/kinsey.asp This site Concerned Women For America was started:
In order to reveal what the film Kinsey is leaving out, Concerned Women for America constructed this Web page as a resource for writers, editors, academics, activists and people who are just curious about what Kinsey was really about.
The page is good and the information is based on research by Dr. Reisman. This woman is a  hurricane. She has worked very hard to get the word out on the destruction of Kinsey's research. She has been exposing the truth about Kinsey for 30 years. I am sure that at first she was looked at like she was crazy. No one has challenged Kinsey's research to the extent and consistence that Dr. Reisman has. She is a Media Forensic specialist and is a force to be reckoned with. Her dogged approach has brought to light many of the atrocities that Kinsey was involved with. The csfa.org site explains that:
Kinsey's work has been instrumental in advancing acceptance of pornography, homosexuality, abortion, and condom-based sex education, and his disciples even today are promoting a view of children as "sexual beings." Their ultimate goal: to normalize pedophilia, or "adult-child sex.
This is what my research is showing. That Kinsey and his research is directly related to the movement to normalize pedophilia. I have a page on YouTube that helps to get the word out on this topic. Tonight when I went there I received a message from a http://www.youtube.com/user/DukeofAnarchy. There is a video on YouTube called How Sex Offender Registries Fail Us. I listened to and watched the video. It was very biased toward the sex offender. The stories that are shared are about a couple who were dating in their teens and had consensual sex. The girls parents called the police and the young man got arrested because the girl was 15. While I empathize with this dilemma that has been faced by young teens. I believe the purpose of the video was to help promote the agenda to normalize pedophilia.

I say this because I found out about the video when I was on boychat. If you follow my other blog you know I go to boychat, one of the many pedophile chat forums where pedophile talk to each other. I do this to get the word out on what these pedophiles are talking about and how skewed their views are. I make videos about what they say and post them to my YouTube account. I have found out about investigations into the take down of pedophile rings from the pedophiles themselves. After listening to this video I drew the conclusion that this video was part of the propaganda to normalize pedophilia. They are doing this by playing on the sympathies of the adults who were on the registry because when they were teens they had sex with peers who were younger. Who wouldn't have some sympathy/empathy to a situation like that. Kids do make stupid decisions and there are those who are on the sexual offender registry because they had sex with people who were months younger than them.

Thursday, March 15, 2012

THE RE-WHITEWASHING OF PEDOPHILE ALFRED KINSEY

This is another good article that explains in great detail how corrupt Kinsey was. http://www.newswithviews.com/Duke/selwyn.htm I'm not meaning to stay so focused on Kinsey. Since he was the start of so much moral decay in this country I think I need to focus on him and the impact he has had on everything. This includes: sexual education, changing penal codes across the US,  and promoting deviant behavior, to name a few. I am doing a ton of research on Kinsey and how his lies have affected  a lot of what we all accept or have accepted as just part of our culture. We need to make sure to know what has lead to the movement to normalize pedophilia. In learning what took place to get the movement where it is will help those of us who want to stop it. We will have the knowledge to argue against those promoting it. Truth and data, empirical data is how we can argue against what those who wish to promote this deviant agenda.

I found this web site that looks at the changing of sex in a century.  http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/usa/usnews112.htm I thought it would be interesting to post what the article lists.
Sex in a century
Over the decades, American attitudes toward sex have changed greatly. At the beginning of the 20th century, most people simply didn’t discuss the topic. Today, sex is freely talked about even on TV and radio shows. Here are some milestones.
1905: In his work “Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality,” Austrian scientist Sigmund Freud writes that our sexual drive is responsible for what we do, why we do it and even who we are. Differences in personalities originate in childhood sexual experiences, he theorizes.

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Victim of notorious sex experiments speaks out 'Esther White' interview exposes 'evil' scientific research

This article is an article that discusses a woman who was a victim of Kinsey's child sexual abuse experiments.http://www.wnd.com/2010/10/214105/ It is well known that Kinsey used flawed data. He used prisoners and sexual predators as subject for his experiments. He knew full well that when he was collecting data from prisoners and sexual predators they were not representative of the general population. The following is an excerpt from the article:
Kinsey’s research is highly controversial for being based disproportionately on hundreds of interviews with prisoners, sex offenders and prostitutes. Kinsey and his colleagues falsely classified these people as normal World War II-era citizens, leaving the validity of his findings open to question.  But the most infamous – indeed, criminal – aspect of Kinsey’s research involved what is first revealed in black and white in Tables 30 to 34 of his landmark 1948 book, “Sexual Behavior in the Human Male.”
These tables record how long it took for children to achieve “orgasm” and how many “orgasms” they were able to achieve over a period of minutes or hours.  Hundreds of innocent boys suffered at the hands of pedophiles to compile this data.
The victim uses the pseudo name Ester White. She describes her father using a time clock while he was sexually abusing her. One time a paper fell from the dresser and she was able to see what it was. It had a check off list of what "type" of experiments to do on victims. The only reason her father stopped sexually abusing her is that her mother caught her father. her mother got furious and threw her father out. He was able to talk his way back into his family. Ester was able to find her voice when he tried to abuse her by telling him she'd tell her mother. I found the video of the BBC special
Kinseys pedophiles. It explains the research that went into proving that Kinsey used pedophiles to sexually abuse children in order to do is research.


What I have found so weird is that when his books were released and his research on children's sexuality is addressed, why the heck didn't people question how he gathered his research? Why didn't people question who gathered the research? It is obvious if you are doing research into children's sexuality then you some how have to have access to children to sexually abuse. Can you see how Kinsey played a role in the normalization of pedophilia.